TAQLEED Issue ??? BLOOD Nikalnay say WUZU ??? Imam Abu Hanifa Vs Imam Shafai ??? Engr. Muhammad Ali

جزاك الله خير

Extremely ignorant person! He constantly makes his own exaggerated claims or out of context claims and in some cases makes up totally false claims about others that is not the position of those people, and then he refutes it! Strawman fallacy! Please be very very careful because he mixes good with bad!

Here is just one example to demonstrate but there are many! He claims that because Hanafi jurists think blood is impure that's why they do wudhu and that there is no hadith to support this (10:00). This is categorically false! The following are important hadiths regarding the subject that this guy has omitted deliberately or through ignorance.

Contrary to his lies that he so confidently and arrogantly spouts, there is not one but multiple ahadith about wudhu being necessary before salat if blood runs from it's origin. I've given the references too.

قال رسول اللّٰه صلعم الوضوء من كلّ دم ساىٔل (الكامل)
قال رسول اللّٰه صلعم الوضوء من كلّ دم ساىٔل (الدارقطني)
قال رسول اللّٰه صلعم و إذا ادبرت فاغسلي عنك الدم ثم صلي ، قال ابو معاوية في حديثه : و قال : توضّٔي لكل صلاة …(الترمذي)
عن سعيد ابن المسيب انه رعف في صلاته فاتي دار ام سلمة زوج النبي صلعم فتوضأ ولم يتكلم و بني على صلاته (الجوهر النقي)

There are so many more athaar saheehah supporting this from many authentic sources.

Many sahabah (Ali, ibn Masood, Alqamah, Al Shabi, Urwah, Nakhai, Qatadah, Hammad rdah etc)as well as many tabeens (Thawri, Al Hasan bin yahya, Abdullah bin Al Hasan, Al Awzai, Ibn Hanbal, Ibn Rahwayh etc) supported this. This is just basic and to the point otherwise many deeper discussions of usool and common sense qiyas etc come into this. Yet with all this evidence it seems this charlatan thinks he knows better!

This took me about 30 minutes because of having to write on my phone. If you are teaching, you should have alot more depth in your research. Unfortunately you lack reliability and trustworthiness, and more than that you just lie over and over again! You lack criticality and balanced view of the subject. I understand why laymen would fall for this fitnah you create. The problem is when good scholars with knowledge do nothing, you have any Tom, Dick and Engineer to fill the gap in the market! May Allah grant us guidance.

NOTE: Brief response to the hadith you mentioned. 1) hadihee waqeatun juzeyytun laa umooma lahaa. It's an isolated incident that cannot be generalised 2) it's an abnormal situation and you don't use abnormal situations to draw general rulings. Do you know anyone getting shot with multiple arrows yet continue praying?! 3) when an arrow pierces, it doesn't result in running blood immediately until arrow is pulled out. 4) your using textual implication and when you have hadith with textual explicitness then the latter is given precidence. 5) you're using an athar. When there is explicit hadith as well as many aathaars then the former is given precidence. 6) when there is a dispute between haram and halal then haram is given precidence 7) when there is a dispute between clear statement and unconscious action then statement is given precidence. There is more but I'll leave this for you to digest! By the way, I tried to write like a layman otherwise this is technical and has its own terminology.

NABI pak s.a.w.w ky jasa hai koi nahi..💚💜💙
Babay molve or mufti ty shey koi nahi..🧙‍♂️🤡🦍

Allah pak ali bhai ko lambi umar or sahat wali zindgi day….amieen….🤲🌹❣

Jazak Allah o khaira ali bahi….👍🌹❣

Hazrat Ayesha wali hadees se ye to maan liya k bivi ko touch krny sy wazoo nhi tootta lekin ye kaisi namaz thi k bivi k paon sajday ki jga pr hoty thy or sajda krny k lie paon peechy krwae jaty thy?????

Assalam ulekum.

امام بہت بڑی شے ہے تو کوئی شے ہے ہی نہیں

اماموں کی جہالت نے دین کو ناممکن بنایا۔ جہاں آسانی ہو لے لو۔ بس دین سے نہ پھرو ۔ rigidity چھوڑ دو

Muhammad Ali Sahb fazale amaal ki hadees Jo Apne code ki woh AAP Goor se parhe