Wassi-e-RASOOL a.s peh SUNNI & SHIAH Ikhtelaf main HAQ kia hai ??? (By Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza)

Tamam umr yunhi bolte rahenge
Firqah ka chshma andha hota hai.

Mirza ka bab zubir ali

bohat acha explain kia.
Jazak Allah Khair.

Acha ye btaiye Kya qulle imaan phla khalifa banne ka haq nahi rakhta tha. Kal me alam use duga jo gaire farrar hoga jo mard hoga jo khuda rasol se mohabbat karta hoga aur Allah aur rasul usse mohabbat karte hoge kya khalifat ke lie mola Ali behtar nahi the jinke bare itne fazail he shere khuda. Jise khuda ne sher kaha ho kya wo khilafat ka pahla haq nahi rakhta the. Batao Ali ka zikr Karna ibadat he Ali ki mohabbat dil me rakhna ibadat He. Itne fazail mola ki shan Me he mola Ali se behtar khalifa kon ho sakta He

55b

Khudaa k lyi apni aqal sy fatway Dena band kijyi Quran or ahle-bait dono sath sath h or hoze kausar par nabi Pak s w.w sy milyngi

Ali Bhai You are doing great work……Real Muslim….

سر پلیز سرکار نبی پاک کے جنازے کے بارے میں کچھ بتایئں

In the book “Al-Kafi fil-Usool, a collection of ahadith attributed to the Prophet SAWS and some of the Imams of the Shi’a, and held in the same esteem amongst Shi’a as Sahih Bukhari is amongst the Ahl us-Sunnah, we find the following…”Whoever sets up another Imam besides ‘Ali and delays ‘Ali’s caliphate is a polytheist.” (vol.10 p.55) (this “hadith” refers to everyone who accepts the validity of the caliphates of Abu Bakr, ‘Umar and Uthman. The Shi’a claim that the caliphate was stolen from ‘Ali, and only he and his descendants have the right to rule the Muslims):

What we are talking about here is the Wilayat (Mastership) of ‘Ali ibne Abi Talib (as) over the Ummah after Rasulullah (s). To expand on this we will need to explain that there is a world of difference between the two schools on Imamate. We will Inshallah expand on this in a separate chapter. Suffice it to say, Sunnis believe that the appointment of an Imam is the duty of the public, Shi’as believe it is a duty (RIGHT) of Allah (swt) via the Prophet. We would ask someone rationally, is it really logical to believe that the Prophet (S) did not even bother to leave a successor after him?, When he predicted that the Ummah would be divided, fall into turmoil, fight and kill each other? If the Sahaba thought the issue of Imamate was more important than the Prophet’s Janaza (funeral) don’t you think he did? Did they care more about future interests of the Ummah than him? That’s why we believe that Rasulullah (s) explicitly left a successor and that:

(1) It was Imam Ali (as)
(2) With this appointment he (s) inherited the same rights over the people as did Rasulullah (s)
(3)The Wilayat of ‘Ali is so important that we will be asked about it on the Day of Judgement

We read the following address to Rasulullah (s) in Surah Baqarah verse 120 (Yusuf Ali translation):

Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou follow their form of religion. Say: “The Guidance of Allah,-that is the (only) Guidance.” Wert thou to follow their desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then wouldst thou find neither Protector nor helper against Allah.

Then in Surah Rad verse 37 (Yusuf Ali translation) Allah (swt) speaks to his beloved Messenger (s) as follows:

Thus have We revealed it to be a judgement of authority in Arabic. Wert thou to follow their (vain) desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then wouldn’t thou find neither protector nor defender against Allah.

Does it make sense that Hadhrath Muhammad (s) after whom no other Prophet shall come, is being rebuked that should he turn his back on his position, and follow falsehood, and leave Allah (swt)’s deen he will have no helper? Was there really a risk that Rasulullah (s) might turn his back on Allah (swt)? We are sure that no Muslim would ever entertain such a thought, then why would he address Rasulullah (s) in this manner? Although the verse was addressing Rasulullah (s) we the Shi’a believe that this was in fact an address to the Ummah at large. Accordingly we argue that an individual that ‘knowingly’ is aware of the wilayat of ‘Ali and then despite this seeks to ignore it and follow his own desires is on the path of falsehood.

There is no need for the Minhajj to make this an issue of contention with us since many leading Ulema of Ahl’ul Sunnah in their commentaries of this verse al Maidah ‘Baligh’ (5:67) have stated that following the descent of this verse Rasulullah (s) declared the wilayat of ‘Ali (as) to the people – that he was the Imam after him (s). It is common sense that any Leader when leaving a post puts in to position an individual to succeed him and administer the affairs of the State. Failure to do so will lead to insecurity in the State, uncertainty, confusion and worse still leaves the nation to the mercy of an enemy nation that might take the opportunity and seize power over a leaderless people. Appointment of a successor is the first thing that any ‘sensible’ leader will do. That is why we believe that in accordance with the guidance of Allah (swt) revealed this verse to Rasulullah (s), to openly declare his successor to the masses who had joined him at the time of the Farewell Pilgrimage. The declaration of Ali’s wilayat was to quell the scheming / nefarious planning of the hypocrites. That is why Allah (swt) declared:

“O Apostle! Deliver what has been sent down to you from your Lord; and if you don’t do it, you have not delivered His message (at all); and Allah will protect you from the people …” (Qur’an 5:67).

The following Ulema of Ahl’ul Sunnah have confirmed that the declaration of Ali’s wilayat followed this verse:

Tafseer Mazhari by Thanaullah Panee Pathee Volume 3 page 143

Tafseer Kabeer Volume 3 page 472 narrated on the authorities of Ibn Abbas, al-Bara Ibn Azib, and Muhammad Ibn Ali.

Tafseer Fathul Qadheer Volume 2 page 57 by Shaukhani

Tafseer Durre Manthur under the commentary of verse 5:67

This was clearly that matter that Rasulullah (s) feared that the people would oppose. With the open declaration of Ali’s Wilayat all rules / regulations were completed. Deen was completed with the appointment of a successor / a Guide to ensure that the people followed the right path.

We believe that the evidence is so clear that any rational mind will conclude that this was a declaration of Imamate. Nasibis can disagree but let us cite the comments of one of your very own Deobandi scholars, Shah Ismail Shaheed the Indian reformist who introduced the teachings of Abdul Wahab in India. He writes:

“The Imam is the Prophet’s successor, the Imam has the same relations with Allah as the Prophet had with Allah. The Imam is the leader, in the same way the Prophet had the right to lead the people, the Imam also has the same rights over the people. We read in Surah Azhab ‘The Prophet is aula (authority) to the believers’, and the Prophet will be a witness to this fact on the Day of Judgement. The Prophet has rights over the people, as does the Imam, both in this world and the next, which is why the Prophet said ‘Don’t I have more rights over the people than they have over themselves, to which the people replied ‘Yes’. The Prophet then said ‘Of whomsoever I am Maula, Ali is his Maula’. This is why Allah says in the Qur’an that on the Day of Judgement you will be called according to your Imam (3:17), and why when Allah says ‘And stop they are to be questioned’ (37:24), we will be asked about the Wilayat of Ali on the Day of Judgement”
Munsub-e-Imamate, by Shah Ismail Shaheed, p 71

Shah Ismail was not writing in isolation when he asserted that we would be asked about the Wilayat (Mastership) of Ali (as) on the Day of Judgement.

Numerous Sunni scholars in their commentaries of the verse:

“And stop they are to be questioned” (Qur’an 37:24) – have narrated from Abu Said al Khudri (ra) that he heard the Prophet say that:

“On the Day of Judgement the people will be asked “whether or not they truly accepted Ali as their Wali (Master), as they were instructed by the Prophet to do, or did they ignore it”.
al Sawaiq al Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajr Haythami, Ch 11 subheading 1, as quoted by Wahidi and al Daylami; Faraid al Samtain, by Hamawaini, section 14; Mudham Durar al Samtain, by Jamal al Din al Zarandi

Mohib al Tabari, in his “Riyadh al Nadira”, records that the Holy Prophet (saww) declared:

“On the Day of Judgement, when the people will be brought together, no one will be able to pass the Bridge, until they have the ticket declaring Ali’s wilayat”
Riyadh al Nadira, by Mohib al Tabari, Part 3, p 116

لاکھوں سلام خلفائے راشدین رضوان اللہ تعالیٰ علیہم اجمعین پر… ❤

Quran or Mere ahlebayt ek dusre k sathi hain or ye dono mujhse kosar pr milege…
Huzoor s.aww …

ALLAH hi hume deen sikhaye apne gaib se .. Aj kal nhi pta kon khn ly jaye..

Al quran: Musa As Hazrat HarooN as ko apni koom Me Wasih muqarar kar k gayay Toor pe.

Al HadeeS : Ay Ali (as) teri or meri(saww) misal Haroon or Musa kii hai(As) buss meray baad koi nabi nai hoga.
So Waseeh e Rasool saww Mola Ali as hi hain Or moqablaaY me anaaY walay Samri Jadugar oR us sonaaY k Bachray(Bot) k manind.
NOW COMING TO yOur Logic
Hadees Parhii Tu ho gii k (me(saww) tum me do cheeZay choray ja raha hOn QURAN oR AHLE BAIT…. in ko thamaaY rakhna kabhi gumrah nai ho gaaY )
Abh Ahle bait kon???sawal ye hai tu ahle bait tu wahi jin se khuda ne Rijs door kardia(point to be notted :- un ko Rijs se door nahi kia …rijs ko dOoR kia un se) sO Ahle bait as Masoomen hain, gunah hai hi un se door.
(Or goor o fikr karnay walo k liay quran me boht si nishania hain)
Ali as bhi chader me thaaY jub ayat e tatheer nazil hoi Tu Ali as ahle bait me se…..
Now come back to that hadeeS k Quran or ahl e bait ko thamaaY rakho …kabhi gumRah nai ho gaaY…
abh Eng ho ap bhai tu simple sa math rule samjh hi saktay hain…
wasih according to rasool( Quran and Ahl e bait)
Ahl e bait=Masoom= Mola Ali

Ager koi galt baat ki tu authentic jawab warNa Ek Alim ko baat chupani nai chahiay … Begair Daraay Haq bian karna chahiaY

Beshak ye baat bilkul durust hai Quran paak hi wasi e Rasool SAWW hai magar ye kehna ke hamain ya mujhey Quran kaafi hai ye kehna bhi durust kyunke tamaam muslmano ka aqeeda hai ke Allah ne Quran ki tashrih kilye Nabi SAWW ki zaat e paak ko bhaija or InShaAllah aap ko bhi is baat par eetiraz na hoga ke agar Quran ko samajhna or Rasool S.A.W ki seerat ko samajhna hai to us tak puhanchnay ka waze aaina Hazrat Mola A.S ki zaat hai kyun ke khod Rasool S.A.W.W ne farmaya hai Main Ilm ka sheher hoon or AliA.S us ka darwaaza hai pas jo ilm ki talab rakhta hai darwaaza par aajaye to soocho Nabi S.A.W.W ne ye kyun nahi kaha main ilm ka sheher hoon or Quran us ka darwaaza hai or aap ne Man kuntum Mola Fahaza Ali Mola is hadees se mutaliq kaha to bas mein aap zara alfaaz pe ghoor kijye or moqa o mehal pe ghoor kijye Tamaam Muslmano ka is baat par aqeeda hai ek laakh chobees hazaar pighambar aaye or Zara aap mujhey pachaas ke naam likh ke bataa dain aap nahin bataa paein gay kyun ke Quran main hi sirf pachis ke naam hain har ek ko naam lekar nahin pukara giya to jis ko paighambar S.A.W.W khood apnay kaandhoon pe utha kar keh rahay hoon Man kuntum fahaza Ali yani Mola word do dafa aaya hai to dono ki meaning bhi to ek hogi or kuntum keh rahay hain yani har zare ko mukhatib kar rahay hain or fahaza keh kar ye bataa rahay hai ke jis jis ka main aaqa us us ka Ali aaqa or zaroori hai Mola ki meaning doost ki ho kya Hazrat Mola AliA.S or Nabi S.A.W.W pehle Mola nahi thay ham drood main parhtay hain syed in a waMolana to is ke meaning doost ke hotay hain

Ajeeb haq byan karne wala hai yeh person

Agar muj sa koei bat krna chata ho is bat par to rabta Kar Sakata ha 03377045503 whatsapp b ha

Agar washi Quran ha to kya Ali Quran sa alag ha

Teri Surat pe lanat

Es kuty se bara jhota koi ni hai wasi ka mtlb hai waris yani pak nabi ky din ka waris or quran ka waris balky qul islam ka waris or suno jis abu bakr omar or usman ki baty krty ho na ye tw wo ty jino ne jang e ohad ma rasool ko chor ky bhag gaye ty or nabi pak ky vesal ky bad inho ne pak syeda batool Fatima s.m.a ko shaheed kia kya bhala ale rasool ky dushman musalman bi ho sakty hai es jhoty molvi ko khud quran ka kuch ni pata ky quran qalamullah hai na ky waris quran ma Allah pak farmata hai ma Allah tmara wali hon or mere rasool Muhammad s.a.w tmary wali hain or wo tmary wali hai jo halat e rakoo ma zakat dyty hai or ye ayat tab nazil hui ti jb mula Ali mushkil kusha a.s ne halat e rakoo ma zakat di ti haq ya Ali a.s

not satisfied

Mirza ali bahi
Janab to HAZARAT MUHAMMAD S.A.W nay wo kon c Ahdees Farmai thi jo .
Main tumhary darmiyan 2 chezay choder raha hn
QURAN OR AHLE BAIT.
ap nay to mamla he change kar diya?

Ap baten kahin kahin thik or kahin kshin zalim bhi rzi Allah mzlom bhi rzi Allah